Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/11] selftests/bpf: Add test for race in btf_try_get_module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 1:04 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:50:33AM IST, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 09:51:15PM +0530, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> > > This adds a complete test case to ensure we never take references to
> > > modules not in MODULE_STATE_LIVE, which can lead to UAF, and it also
> > > ensures we never access btf->kfunc_set_tab in an inconsistent state.
> > >
> > > The test uses userfaultfd to artifically widen the race.
> >
> > Fancy!
> > Does it have to use a different module?
> > Can it be part of bpf_testmod somehow?
>
> I was thinking of doing it with bpf_testmod, but then I realised it would be a
> problem with parallel mode of test_progs, where another selftest in parallel may
> rely on bpf_testmod (which this test would unload, load and make it fault, and
> then fail the load before restoring it by loading again), so I went with
> bpf_testmod.
>
> Maybe we can hardcode a list of tests to be executed serially in --workers=n > 1
> mode? All serial tests are then executed in the beginning (or end), and then it
> starts invoking others in parallel as usual.

you can mark test as serial with "serial_" prefix, grep for that, we
have a bunch of tests like this. But if you are going to unload and
reload bpf_testmod, you will be forcing any bpf_testmod-using test to
be serial, which I'm not sure is such a great idea.

>
> --
> Kartikeya



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux