On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 5:11 PM Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > -- > > > 2.32.0 > > > > > > > Florian, thanks for prompt turnaround on this. Seeing > > conntrack -C > > 107530 > > mandates the check what flows consume this many entries. I cannot do > > this if conntrack -L skips anything while kernel defaults to not > > exposing conntrack table via /proc. This server is not supposed to NAT > > anything by the way. > > Then this patch doesn't change anything. > > Maybe 'conntrack -L unconfirmed' or 'conntrack -L dying' show something? Are you saying that was a patch? v2.32.0? Mind sharing a link for downloading the source and/or packaged release? I would like to test it just in case, and if no luck, what do i do to file it as a bug?
