Re: [nft PATCH 0/5] Reduce cache overhead a bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 07:02:56PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Quick follow-up:
> 
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 06:18:57PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > If ENOENT wasn't reported as EINVAL, We could even fall back to plain
> > NLM_F_DUMP on older kernels. Maybe tackle that first and build upon
> > that?
> 
> Not sure what I was seeing, but I checked again and ENOENT is indeed
> returned as it should. I'll look into the fall back idea then.

Is the fallback really needed? As I said, if -stable kernel works with
this approach, I think it should be fine.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux