On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:26:44 +0200 Phil Sutter wrote: > Sorry for not checking the guideline but quoting advice I once received > from the top of my head instead. Maybe I was incorrect and in obvious > cases the description is optional. The relevant text in [2] at least > doesn't explicitly state it is, while being pretty verbose about it > regarding cover letters. Does this mean that you retract your requirement? If not, could you please make sure that you and the other maintainers are on the same page about this, and document the requirement? Regarding this patch series (if it is to be resent, in part or as a whole): we've discussed the first patch so far; the other two patches have no description, either. Do they need one? If so, could you provide some suggestions? I can't think of anything sensible that isn't already said in the subject, Fixes:, or the modified README text itself. Thanks, Štěpán
