Hi Stepan, On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:42:20PM +0200, Štěpán Němec wrote: > Test inspired by [1] with both the set and stack size reduced by the > same power of 2, to preserve the (pre-baecd1cf2685) segfault on one > hand, and make the test successfully complete (post-baecd1cf2685) in a > few seconds even on weaker hardware on the other. > > (The reason I stopped at 128kB stack size is that with 64kB I was > getting segfaults even with baecd1cf2685 applied.) > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908127 > > Signed-off-by: Štěpán Němec <snemec@xxxxxxxxxx> > Helped-by: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx> Thanks for the patch, just one remark: [...] > +cat >>"$ruleset_file" <<\EOF ~~~ Is this backslash a typo or intentional? Cheers, Phil
