[PATCH nf-next 02/15] netfilter: nft_dynset: relax superfluous check on set updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Relax this condition to make add and update commands idempotent for sets
with no timeout. The eval function already checks if the set element
timeout is available and updates it if the update command is used.

Fixes: 22fe54d5fefc ("netfilter: nf_tables: add support for dynamic set updates")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c | 11 +----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c b/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
index 6ba3256fa844..87f3af4645d9 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
@@ -198,17 +198,8 @@ static int nft_dynset_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 		return -EBUSY;
 
 	priv->op = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFTA_DYNSET_OP]));
-	switch (priv->op) {
-	case NFT_DYNSET_OP_ADD:
-	case NFT_DYNSET_OP_DELETE:
-		break;
-	case NFT_DYNSET_OP_UPDATE:
-		if (!(set->flags & NFT_SET_TIMEOUT))
-			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-		break;
-	default:
+	if (priv->op > NFT_DYNSET_OP_DELETE)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-	}
 
 	timeout = 0;
 	if (tb[NFTA_DYNSET_TIMEOUT] != NULL) {
-- 
2.30.2




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux