You dropped the wrong patvh from patchwork

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Pablo,

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 06:27:56PM +1100, Duncan Roe wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 03:39:48PM +1100, Duncan Roe wrote:
> > - configure --help lists non-default documentation options.
> >   Looking around the web, this seemed to me to be what most projects do.
> >   Listed options are --enable-html-doc & --disable-man-pages.
> > - --with-doxygen is removed: --disable-man-pages also disables doxygen unless
> >   --enable-html-doc is asserted.
> > If html is requested, `make install` installs it in htmldir.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Duncan Roe <duncan_roe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v2: broken out from 0001-build-doc-Fix-man-pages.patch
> > v3: no change (still part of a series)
> > v4: remove --without-doxygen since -disable-man-pages does that
> > v5: - update .gitignore for clean `git status` after in-tree build
> >     - in configure.ac:
> >       - ensure all variables are always set (avoid leakage from environment)
> >       - provide helpful warning if HTML enabled but dot not found
> [...]
> Sorry Pablo, this is for libnetfilter_queue.
> I don't see it in patchwork - did you get rid of it already?
> Will re-send with correct Sj.
>
Sorry again for the confusion but you dropped the good libnetfilter_log patch
that was Tested-by: Jeremy Sowden and left the bad libnetfilter_log patch that
actually applies to libnetfilter_queue.
To save you the time to reinstate the dropped patch, I have re-sent it.
It's in Patchwork - title is

libnetfilter_log,v5,1/1] build: doc: `make` generates requested documentation

Can you please post a comment why you have not applied this patch or the
libnetfilter_queue corrresponding patch?

Can I change anything to get you to apply them?

Cheers ... Duncan.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux