When the interface against which you match in the "raw prerouting" is enslaved
in a VRF matching is different in the kernel 5.4 and kernels 5.10 and later (I
have no systems to check kernels in between).
On 5.4, veth interface is matched and zone is set accordingly, then vrf
interface is matched again, rule is executed, according to trace, but once set
zone does not change.
On 5.10 and later, the rule that should match veth interface _does not appear in
the trace_, despite trace shows the veth as the `iif` at that moment. Then the
rule that matches vrf interface is executed, and corresponding zone is set.
Reproducer script creates a veth pair with one end enslaved in a vrf, and sends
a packet to the unenslaved end of the veth. In the prerouting chain, there are
rules that set different conntrack zone depending on which iif matched - veth or
vrf. As a result, entries are created in different zones when the script runs on
earlier and on later kernels. Here are the results (observe different zones),
and the script is below.
========
5.4.86-pserver
conntrack v1.4.5 (conntrack-tools): connection tracking table has been emptied.
PING 172.30.30.2 (172.30.30.2) from 172.30.30.1 vein: 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 172.30.30.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.128 ms
--- 172.30.30.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.128/0.128/0.128/0.000 ms
icmp 1 30 src=172.30.30.1 dst=172.30.30.2 type=8 code=0 id=13818 [UNREPLIED]
src=172.30.30.2 dst=172.30.30.1 type=0 code=0 id=13818 mark=0 zone=1 use=1
conntrack v1.4.5 (conntrack-tools): 1 flow entries have been shown.
========
5.13.0-16-generic
conntrack v1.4.6 (conntrack-tools): connection tracking table has been emptied.
PING 172.30.30.2 (172.30.30.2) from 172.30.30.1 vein: 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 172.30.30.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.117 ms
--- 172.30.30.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.117/0.117/0.117/0.000 ms
icmp 1 30 src=172.30.30.1 dst=172.30.30.2 type=8 code=0 id=104 [UNREPLIED]
src=172.30.30.2 dst=172.30.30.1 type=0 code=0 id=104 mark=0 zone=2 use=1
conntrack v1.4.6 (conntrack-tools): 1 flow entries have been shown.
========
#!/bin/sh
IPIN=172.30.30.1
IPOUT=172.30.30.2
PFXL=30
ip li sh vein >/dev/null 2>&1 && ip li del vein
ip li sh tvrf >/dev/null 2>&1 && ip li del tvrf
nft list table testct >/dev/null 2>&1 && nft delete table testct
ip li add vein type veth peer veout
ip li add tvrf type vrf table 9876
ip li set veout master tvrf
ip li set vein up
ip li set veout up
ip li set tvrf up
sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.veout.accept_local=1
ip addr add $IPIN/$PFXL dev vein
ip addr add $IPOUT/$PFXL dev veout
nft -f - <<__END__
table testct {
chain rawpre {
type filter hook prerouting priority raw;
# iif { veout, tvrf } meta nftrace set 1
iif veout ct zone set 1 return
iif tvrf ct zone set 2 return
notrack
}
chain rawout {
type filter hook output priority raw;
notrack
}
}
__END__
uname -r
conntrack -F
ping -W 1 -c 1 -I vein $IPOUT
conntrack -L
========
Is this a known situation? Which behavior is "correct"?
Thank you,
Eugene
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
