On 8/16/21 12:56 PM, Florian Westphal wrote:
alexandre.ferrieux@xxxxxxxxxx <alexandre.ferrieux@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, the problem is backwards compatibility. Indeed I'd propose more
flexible batching via an array of ids instead of a maxid. But the main added
value of this flexibility is to enable reused-small-integers ids, like file
descriptors. As long as the maxid API remains in place, this is impossible.
You cannot remove the maxid API.
Ok, I'll just propose an id-hashtable patch.
I'm thinking of using "modulo queue_maxlen" instead of a traditional hash
function (and queue_maxlen as table size) , as this would yield perfect hashing
for the FIFO case.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
