Re: [PATCH nf-next] x_tables: never register tables by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 04:47:19PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> For historical reasons x_tables still register tables by default in the
> initial namespace.
> Only newly created net namespaces add the hook on demand.
> 
> This means that the init_net always pays hook cost, even if no filtering
> rules are added (e.g. only used inside a single netns).
> 
> Note that the hooks are added even when 'iptables -L' is called.
> This is because there is no way to tell 'iptables -A' and 'iptables -L'
> apart at kernel level.
> 
> The only solution would be to register the table, but delay hook
> registration until the first rule gets added (or policy gets changed).
> 
> That however means that counters are not hooked either, so 'iptables -L'
> would always show 0-counters even when traffic is flowing which might be
> unexpected.
> 
> This keeps table and hook registration consistent with what is already done
> in non-init netns: first iptables(-save) invocation registers both table
> and hooks.
> 
> This applies the same solution adopted for ebtables.
> All tables register a template that contains the l3 family, the name
> and a constructor function that is called when the initial table has to
> be added.

Applied to nf-next, thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux