Re: [PATCH nft 2/2] evaluate: restore interval + concatenation in anonymous set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 01:34:03PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
> 
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 07:15:38PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > Perform the table and set lookup only for non-anonymous sets, where the
> > incremental cache update is required.
> > 
> > The problem fixed by 7aa08d45031e ("evaluate: Perform set evaluation on
> > implicitly declared (anonymous) sets") resurrected after the cache
> > rework.
> > 
> >  # nft add rule x y tcp sport . tcp dport vmap { ssh . 0-65535 : accept, 0-65535 . ssh : accept }
> >  BUG: invalid range expression type concat
> >  nft: expression.c:1422: range_expr_value_low: Assertion `0' failed.
> >  Abort
> > 
> > Add a test case to make sure this does not happen again.
> > 
> > Fixes: 5ec5c706d993 ("cache: add hashtable cache for table")
> > Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This triggers a warning:
> 
> evaluate.c: In function 'set_evaluate':
> evaluate.c:3870:13: warning: 'table' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>  3870 |         if (set_cache_find(table, set->handle.set.name) == NULL)
>       |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hm, this needs to be restricted to anonymous sets, attaching patch.
diff --git a/src/evaluate.c b/src/evaluate.c
index 5311963a20c5..7cd90e2c1840 100644
--- a/src/evaluate.c
+++ b/src/evaluate.c
@@ -3867,7 +3867,8 @@ static int set_evaluate(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct set *set)
 	}
 	ctx->set = NULL;
 
-	if (set_cache_find(table, set->handle.set.name) == NULL)
+	if (!(set->flags & NFT_SET_ANONYMOUS) &&
+	    !set_cache_find(table, set->handle.set.name))
 		set_cache_add(set_get(set), table);
 
 	return 0;

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux