Hi, I'll reply to both of you here. Cc'ing Florian. On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:50:05AM +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > On 5/11/21 10:24 AM, Phil Sutter wrote: > > Hi Pablo, > > > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 06:53:21PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > Add a catchall expression (EXPR_SET_ELEM_CATCHALL). > > > > > > Use the underscore (_) to represent the catch-all set element, e.g. > > > > Why did you choose this over asterisk? We have the latter as wildcard > > symbol already (although a bit limited), so I think it would be more > > intuitive than underscore. I looked at several programming languages, one of them is using it (a very trendy one...), so I thought we have to use it / place it at the deep core of Netfilter for this reason, even if it absolutely makes no sense. Actually, the real reason is that I was trying to reduce interactions with bash, which most distros tend to use. > Moreover, > > instead of a symbol, perhaps an explicit word (string, like "default") may > contribute to a more understandable syntax. I also considered "default" to reduce interactions with bash, problem is that it's likely to be a valid input value as a key, for example, there are a few keys in /etc/iproute2/rt_* files that use default, and that will clash with it. So I'm more inclined to Phil's proposal to use asterisk, even if it needs to be escaped in bash, I'll send a v2.
