Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Isn't that library code? At the very least this should use > > nft_print(). > > Good point, but for the upcoming identical change to nftables! ;) > There I'm still undecided about the best way to handle it. For iptables, > I guess this minimal error reporting to stderr for a case that shouldn't > happen is fine. ACK? Oh right.