Re: [iptables PATCH] nft: Increase BATCH_PAGE_SIZE to support huge rulesets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Isn't that library code?  At the very least this should use
> > nft_print().
> 
> Good point, but for the upcoming identical change to nftables! ;)
> There I'm still undecided about the best way to handle it. For iptables,
> I guess this minimal error reporting to stderr for a case that shouldn't
> happen is fine. ACK?

Oh right.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux