On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 17:08:35 +0200 Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander.mikhalitsyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > At the moment, status_xlate_print function prints statusmask as comma-separated > > sequence of enabled statusmask flags. But if we have inverted conntrack ctstatus > > condition then we have to use more complex expression (if more than one flag enabled) > > because nft not supports syntax like "ct status != expected,assured". > > Also applied. Thank you for your help and review! Regards, Alex
