On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 02:37:03PM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 2021-03-18 17:30, Phil Sutter wrote: [...] > > Why did you leave the object-related logs in place? They should reappear > > at commit time just like chains and sets for instance, no? > > There are other paths that can trigger these messages that don't go > through nf_tables_commit() that affect the configuration data. The > counters are considered config data for auditing purposes and the act of > resetting them is audittable. And the only time we want to emit a > record is when they are being reset. Oh, I see. I wasn't aware 'nft reset' bypasses the transaction logic, thanks for clarifying! Cheers, Phil
