Hi Pablo, On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:38:32AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:55:02PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > erec_print() unconditionally dereferences erec->locations->indesc, so > > make sure it is valid when either creating an erec or adding a location. > > I guess your're trigger a bug where erec is indesc is NULL, thing is > that indesc should be always set on. Is there a reproducer for this bug? Yes, exactly. I hit it when trying to clean up the netdev family reject support, while just "hacking around". You can trigger it with the following change: | --- a/src/evaluate.c | +++ b/src/evaluate.c | @@ -2718,7 +2718,7 @@ static int stmt_evaluate_reject_bridge(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct stmt *stmt, | const struct proto_desc *desc; | | desc = ctx->pctx.protocol[PROTO_BASE_LL_HDR].desc; | - if (desc != &proto_eth && desc != &proto_vlan && desc != &proto_netdev) | + if (desc != &proto_eth && desc != &proto_vlan) | return stmt_binary_error(ctx, | &ctx->pctx.protocol[PROTO_BASE_LL_HDR], | stmt, "unsupported link layer protocol"); and this ruleset: | table netdev t { | chain c { | reject | } | } Cheers, Phil