Hi,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 02:34:05PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > diff --git a/tests/py/inet/ip.t.payload.netdev b/tests/py/inet/ip.t.payload.netdev
> > > index 95be919..38ed0ad 100644
> > > --- a/tests/py/inet/ip.t.payload.netdev
> > > +++ b/tests/py/inet/ip.t.payload.netdev
> > > @@ -12,3 +12,17 @@ netdev test-netdev ingress
> > > [ payload load 6b @ link header + 6 => reg 10 ]
> > > [ lookup reg 1 set __set%d ]
> > >
> > > +# meta protocol ip ip saddr . ip daddr . ether saddr { 1.1.1.1 . 2.2.2.2 . ca:fe:ca:fe:ca:fe }
> > > +__set%d test-netdev 3
> > > +__set%d test-netdev 0
> > > + element 01010101 02020202 fecafeca 0000feca : 0 [end]
> > > +netdev test-netdev egress
> > > + [ meta load protocol => reg 1 ]
> > > + [ cmp eq reg 1 0x00000008 ]
> > > + [ meta load iiftype => reg 1 ]
> ~~~~~~~
>
> shouldn't nft add oiftype for egress?
Oh, you're right. So I "take everything back and claim the opposite". ;)
To cover for the different dependency expressions, we need to introduce
hook-specific payload files. :/
Cheers, Phil
