Re: [libnftnl PATCH 1/2] set_elem: Use nftnl_data_reg_snprintf()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [libnftnl PATCH 1/2] set_elem: Use nftnl_data_reg_snprintf()
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 19:30:23 +0100
Cc: netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20201214180251.11408-1-phil@nwl.cc>
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 07:02:50PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Introduce a flag to allow toggling the '0x' prefix when printing data
> values, then use the existing routines to print data registers from
> set_elem code.

Patches LGTM.

You will have to update tests/py too, right?

Thanks.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [libnftnl PATCH 1/2] set_elem: Use nftnl_data_reg_snprintf()
  - From: Phil Sutter

References:
- [libnftnl PATCH 1/2] set_elem: Use nftnl_data_reg_snprintf()
  - From: Phil Sutter

Prev by Date: [libnftnl PATCH 2/2] set_elem: Include key_end data reg in print output
Next by Date: [PATCH][next] netfilter: nftables: fix incorrect increment of loop counter
Previous by thread: [libnftnl PATCH 2/2] set_elem: Include key_end data reg in print output
Next by thread: Re: [libnftnl PATCH 1/2] set_elem: Use nftnl_data_reg_snprintf()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netfitler Users] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [LARTC] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux