Re: [iptables PATCH] tests: shell: Stabilize nft-only/0009-needless-bitwise_0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Pablo,

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 01:11:54PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:37:23PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 07:50:00PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:57:57PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > > Netlink debug output varies depending on host's endianness and therefore
> > > > the test fails on Big Endian machines. Since for the sake of asserting
> > > > no needless bitwise expressions in output the actual data values are not
> > > > relevant, simply crop the output to just the expression names.
> > > 
> > > Probably we can fix this in libnftnl before we apply patches like this
> > > to nft as well?
> > 
> > You're right, ignoring the problems in nft testsuite is pretty
> > inconsistent. OTOH this is the first test that breaks iptables testsuite
> > on Big Endian while nft testsuite is entirely broken. ;)
> 
> Do you think we can fix this from the testsuite site? It would require
> to replicate payload files. The snprintf printing is used for
> debugging only at this stage. That would fix nft and this specific case.
> 
> > I had a look at libnftnl and it seems like even kernel support is needed
> > to carry the endianness info from input to output. IMHO data should be
> > in a consistent format in netlink messages, but I fear we can't change
> > this anymore. I tried to print the data byte-by-byte, but we obviously
> > still get problems with any data in host byte order. Do you see an
> > easier way to fix this than adding extra info to all expressions
> > containing data?
> 
> Probably we can make assumptions based on context, such as payload
> expression always express things in network byte order, and annotate
> that such register stores something in network byteorder. For meta,
> assume host byte order. Unless there is an explicit byteorder
> expression.

I like this simple approach, but it's not easy to implement: libnftnl
doesn't know about other expressions, so 'cmp' for instance doesn't know
which expression stored data in reg 1 and therefore can't deduce the
likely endianness of its stored data.

Any idea how to solve that?

Thanks, Phil



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux