On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 1:23 AM Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Legacy would still be flawed though. > > Its fine too, new rule blob gets handled (and match/target checkentry > called) before old one is dismantled. > > We only have a 0 refcount + hook unregister when rules get > flushed/removed explicitly. Should the patch be used in the meantime while this gets worked out? Francesco
