Re: [PATCH] audit: use the proper gfp flags in the audit_log_nfcfg() calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 4:26 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-03 09:36, Paul Moore wrote:
> > Commit 142240398e50 ("audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg")
> > incorrectly passed gfp flags to audit_log_nfcfg() which were not
> > consistent with the calling function, this commit fixes that.
> >
> > Fixes: 142240398e50 ("audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg")
> > Reported-by: Jones Desougi <jones.desougi+netfilter@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks good to me.  For what it's worth:

Thanks, applied to audit/next.  Also, for the record, reviews are
always welcome; I really dislike merging my own patches without
reviews.  Sometimes it needs to be done to fix a serious fault, build
error, etc. but in general I'm of the opinion that maintainer patches
should be treated just the same as any other patch.

> Reviewed-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux