Re: [iptables PATCH] doc: libxt_MARK: OUTPUT chain is fine, too

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 07:00:50PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 01:08:22AM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > In order to route packets originating from the host itself based on
> > fwmark, mangle table's OUTPUT chain must be used. Mention this chain as
> > alternative to PREROUTING.
> > 
> > Fixes: c9be7f153f7bf ("doc: libxt_MARK: no longer restricted to mangle table")
> > Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  extensions/libxt_MARK.man | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/extensions/libxt_MARK.man b/extensions/libxt_MARK.man
> > index 712fb76f7340c..b2408597e98f1 100644
> > --- a/extensions/libxt_MARK.man
> > +++ b/extensions/libxt_MARK.man
> > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> >  This target is used to set the Netfilter mark value associated with the packet.
> >  It can, for example, be used in conjunction with routing based on fwmark (needs
> > -iproute2). If you plan on doing so, note that the mark needs to be set in the
> > -PREROUTING chain of the mangle table to affect routing.
> > +iproute2). If you plan on doing so, note that the mark needs to be set in
> > +either the PREROUTING or the OUTPUT chain of the mangle table to affect routing.
> 
> You have two choices:
> 
> * Set the mark in filter OUTPUT chain => it does not affect routing.
> * Set the mark in the mangle OUTPUT chain => it _does_ affect routing.
> 
> Are we on the same page?

Ah, I right I just re-read and it looks fine.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux