On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:38:03PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > The function tries to insert handles into JSON input for echo option. > Yet there may be nothing to do if the given netlink message doesn't > contain a handle, e.g. if it is an 'add element' command. Calling > seqnum_to_json() is pointless overhead in that case, and if input is > large this overhead is significant. Better wait with that call until > after checking if the message is relevant at all. > > Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx> > --- > src/parser_json.c | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/parser_json.c b/src/parser_json.c > index 4468407b0ecd0..3a84bd96af31f 100644 > --- a/src/parser_json.c > +++ b/src/parser_json.c > @@ -3847,12 +3847,15 @@ static uint64_t handle_from_nlmsg(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh) > } > int json_events_cb(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh, struct netlink_mon_handler *monh) > { > - json_t *tmp, *json = seqnum_to_json(nlh->nlmsg_seq); > uint64_t handle = handle_from_nlmsg(nlh); > + json_t *tmp, *json; > void *iter; > > - /* might be anonymous set, ignore message */ > - if (!json || !handle) > + if (!handle) > + return MNL_CB_OK; > + > + json = seqnum_to_json(nlh->nlmsg_seq); > + if (!json) > return MNL_CB_OK; > > tmp = json_object_get(json, "add"); > -- > 2.26.2 Acked-by: Eric Garver <eric@xxxxxxxxxxx> With this I see a 10x improvement when adding many (hundreds) set elements [1]. Thanks Phil! [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834853#c6