Hi Pablo, On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 05:41:13PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 05:37:29PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 05:14:07PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > > > Both functions were very similar already. Under the assumption that they > > > will always either see a range (or start of) that matches exactly or not > > > at all, reduce complexity and make get_set_interval_find() accept NULL > > > (left or) right values. This way it becomes a full replacement for > > > get_set_interval_end(). > > > > I have to go back to the commit log of this patch, IIRC my intention > > here was to allow users to ask for a single element, then return the > > range that contains it. [...] > BTW, are get commands to the pipapo set working like this too? Yes, indeed they do. I added some lines to cover concatenated ranges in sets/0034get_element_0 shell test, will push it out along with this series. Thanks, Phil
