This patch invokes interval_map_decompose() with named sets:
==3402== 2,352 (128 direct, 2,224 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 9 of 9
==3402== at 0x483577F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
==3402== by 0x48996A8: xmalloc (utils.c:36)
==3402== by 0x4899778: xzalloc (utils.c:65)
==3402== by 0x487CB46: expr_alloc (expression.c:45)
==3402== by 0x487E2A0: mapping_expr_alloc (expression.c:1140)
==3402== by 0x4898AA8: interval_map_decompose (segtree.c:1095)
==3402== by 0x4872BDF: __do_add_setelems (rule.c:1569)
==3402== by 0x4872BDF: __do_add_setelems (rule.c:1559)
==3402== by 0x4877936: do_command (rule.c:2710)
==3402== by 0x489F1CB: nft_netlink.isra.5 (libnftables.c:42)
==3402== by 0x489FB07: nft_run_cmd_from_filename (libnftables.c:508)
==3402== by 0x10A9AA: main (main.c:455)
Fixes: dd44081d91ce ("segtree: Fix add and delete of element in same batch")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
src/rule.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/rule.c b/src/rule.c
index 633ca13639ad..9e80c0251947 100644
--- a/src/rule.c
+++ b/src/rule.c
@@ -1563,7 +1563,8 @@ static int __do_add_setelems(struct netlink_ctx *ctx, struct set *set,
if (mnl_nft_setelem_add(ctx, set, expr, flags) < 0)
return -1;
- if (set->init != NULL &&
+ if (!set_is_anonymous(set->flags) &&
+ set->init != NULL &&
set->flags & NFT_SET_INTERVAL &&
set->desc.field_count <= 1) {
interval_map_decompose(expr);
--
2.20.1
