Re: [PATCH net-next] net/sched: act_ct: update nf_conn_acct for act_ct SW offload in flowtable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2020-04-21 2:55 AM, wenxu@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: wenxu <wenxu@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> When the act_ct SW offload in flowtable, The counter of the conntrack
> entry will never update. So update the nf_conn_acct conuter in act_ct
> flowtable software offload.
> 
> Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/sched/act_ct.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> index 1a76639..9adff83 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>  #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h>
>  #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_zones.h>
>  #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.h>
> +#include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_acct.h>
>  #include <net/netfilter/ipv6/nf_defrag_ipv6.h>
>  #include <uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_nat.h>
>  
> @@ -536,6 +537,7 @@ static bool tcf_ct_flow_table_lookup(struct tcf_ct_params *p,
>  	flow_offload_refresh(nf_ft, flow);
>  	nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general);
>  	nf_ct_set(skb, ct, ctinfo);
> +	nf_ct_acct_update(ct, dir, skb->len);
>  
>  	return true;
>  }
> 

Hi wenxu,

Looks good. I also tested this and verified.

Thanks,
Roi

Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux