Re: [PATCH nf] nft_set_rbtree: Drop spurious condition for overlap detection on insertion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed,  1 Apr 2020 16:54:45 +0200
Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Case a1. for overlap detection in __nft_rbtree_insert() is not a valid
> one: start-after-start is not needed to detect any type of interval
> overlap and it actually results in a false positive if, while
> descending the tree, this is the only step we hit after starting from
> the root.

Sorry, please disregard, I sent the wrong version. v2 coming in a few
minutes.

-- 
Stefano




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux