Re: [PATCH nf v2 4/4] nft_set_rbtree: Detect partial overlaps on insertion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Stefano,

On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 03:22:01AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> ...and return -ENOTEMPTY to the front-end in this case, instead of
> proceeding. Currently, nft takes care of checking for these cases
> and not sending them to the kernel, but if we drop the set_overlap()
> call in nft we can end up in situations like:
> 
>  # nft add table t
>  # nft add set t s '{ type inet_service ; flags interval ; }'
>  # nft add element t s '{ 1 - 5 }'
>  # nft add element t s '{ 6 - 10 }'
>  # nft add element t s '{ 4 - 7 }'
>  # nft list set t s
>  table ip t {
>  	set s {
>  		type inet_service
>  		flags interval
>  		elements = { 1-3, 4-5, 6-7 }
>  	}
>  }
> 
> This change has the primary purpose of making the behaviour
> consistent with nft_set_pipapo, but is also functional to avoid
> inconsistent behaviour if userspace sends overlapping elements for
> any reason.

nftables/tests/py is reporting a regression that is related to this
patch. If I locally revert this patch here, tests/py works fine here.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux