[PATCH 21/26] netfilter: ctnetlink: be more strict when NF_CONNTRACK_MARK is not set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Romain Bellan <romain.bellan@xxxxxxxxxx>

When CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK is not set, any CTA_MARK or CTA_MARK_MASK
in netlink message are not supported. We should return an error when one
of them is set, not both

Fixes: 9306425b70bf ("netfilter: ctnetlink: must check mark attributes vs NULL")
Signed-off-by: Romain Bellan <romain.bellan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
index eb190206cd12..9ddfcd002d3b 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ ctnetlink_alloc_filter(const struct nlattr * const cda[], u8 family)
 	struct ctnetlink_filter *filter;
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK
-	if (cda[CTA_MARK] && cda[CTA_MARK_MASK])
+	if (cda[CTA_MARK] || cda[CTA_MARK_MASK])
 		return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
 #endif
 
-- 
2.11.0




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux