Re: general protection fault in nf_flow_table_offload_setup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: general protection fault in nf_flow_table_offload_setup
From: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:07:05 +0100
Cc: coreteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxx, kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, syzkaller-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <0000000000005fc4c505a1833ed3@google.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

syzbot <syzbot+e93c1d9ae19a0236289c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If the result looks correct, please mark the bug fixed by replying with:
 
#syz fix: netfilter: flowtable: skip offload setup if disabled

References:
- general protection fault in nf_flow_table_offload_setup
  - From: syzbot
- Re: general protection fault in nf_flow_table_offload_setup
  - From: syzbot

Prev by Date: Re: general protection fault in nf_flow_table_offload_setup
Next by Date: [PATCH nf] selftests: netfilter: add nfqueue test case
Previous by thread: Re: general protection fault in nf_flow_table_offload_setup
Next by thread: [PATCH nft] evaluate: don't eval unary arguments.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netfitler Users] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [LARTC] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux