Re: [PATCH nf-next,RFC 0/5] Netfilter egress hook

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next,RFC 0/5] Netfilter egress hook
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 13:31:30 +0100
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, coreteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Martin Mares <mj@xxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200304095032.s6ypvmo45d75wkr7@wunner.de>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:50:32AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
[...]
> So what's the consensus?  Shall I post a non-RFC version, rebased on
> current nf-next/master?

Please, move on and rebase on top of nf-next/master.

Thank you.

References:
- [PATCH nf-next,RFC 0/5] Netfilter egress hook
  - From: Lukas Wunner
- Re: [PATCH nf-next,RFC 0/5] Netfilter egress hook
  - From: Pablo Neira Ayuso
- Re: [PATCH nf-next,RFC 0/5] Netfilter egress hook
  - From: Lukas Wunner

Prev by Date: [iptables PATCH v2] connlabel: Allow numeric labels even if connlabel.conf exists
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH nf-next v5 0/4] netfilter: flowtable: add indr-block offload
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH nf-next,RFC 0/5] Netfilter egress hook
Next by thread: [PATCH nft,RFC] src: Support netdev egress hook
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netfitler Users] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [LARTC] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux