Re: Proxy load balancer rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Serguei,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 05:12:07PM +0000, Serguei Bezverkhi (sbezverk) wrote:
> [...]
> > 
> > !
> > !   -m recent --rcheck --seconds 10800 --reap  --rsource - keywords I am looking for equivalent in  nftables  
> > !
> > 
> > -A KUBE-XLB-BAJ42O6WMSSB7YGA -m comment --comment "services-9837/affinity-lb-esipp-transition:" -m recent --rcheck --seconds 10800 --reap --name KUBE-SEP-JAOQ4ZBNFGZ34AZ4 --mask 255.255.255.255 --rsource -j KUBE-SEP-JAOQ4ZBNFGZ34AZ4
> > -A KUBE-XLB-BAJ42O6WMSSB7YGA -m comment --comment "services-9837/affinity-lb-esipp-transition:" -m recent --rcheck --seconds 10800 --reap --name KUBE-SEP-WLHDVQTL57VBPURE --mask 255.255.255.255 --rsource -j KUBE-SEP-WLHDVQTL57VBPURE
> > -A KUBE-XLB-BAJ42O6WMSSB7YGA -m comment --comment "services-9837/affinity-lb-esipp-transition:" -m recent --rcheck --seconds 10800 --reap --name KUBE-SEP-5XWCIKNI3M4MWAMU --mask 255.255.255.255 --rsource -j KUBE-SEP-5XWCIKNI3M4MWAMU
> 
> There is no direct equivalent for recent extension in nftables (yet).

Do we need one? All use cases I've seen can be handled via set infra.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux