Re: [PATCH ghak25 v2 8/9] netfilter: add audit operation field

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 3:23 PM Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
> > index 96cabb095eed..5eab4d898c26 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/audit.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/audit.h
> > @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ extern int __audit_log_bprm_fcaps(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
> >  extern void __audit_fanotify(unsigned int response);
> >  extern void __audit_tk_injoffset(struct timespec64 offset);
> >  extern void __audit_ntp_log(const struct audit_ntp_data *ad);
> > -extern void __audit_nf_cfg(const char *name, u8 af, int nentries);
> > +extern void __audit_nf_cfg(const char *name, u8 af, int nentries, int op);
>
> Consider adding an enum instead of int op.
>
> >       if (audit_enabled)
> > -             audit_nf_cfg(repl->name, AF_BRIDGE, repl->nentries);
> > +             audit_nf_cfg(repl->name, AF_BRIDGE, repl->nentries, 1);
>
> audit_nf_cfg(repl->name, AF_BRIDGE, repl->nentries, AUDIT_XT_OP_REPLACE);
>
> ... would be a bit more readable than '1'.
>
> The name is just an example, you can pick something else.

I agree.  Also, please just merge this into patch 4; I don't see a
solid reason why it shouldn't be there.

--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux