[PATCH 1/4] ct_cpu_seq_next should increase position index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



if seq_file .next fuction does not change position index,
read after some lseek can generate unexpected output.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
index 410809c..4912069 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ static void *ct_cpu_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 		*pos = cpu + 1;
 		return per_cpu_ptr(net->ct.stat, cpu);
 	}
-
+	(*pos)++;
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.3.1




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux