Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Otherwise, if a helper function to check for the families that are > > really supported could be another alternative. But not sure it is > > worth? > > Not worth. > > Probably this patch instead? Just make sure that access to the chain > type array is safe, no direct access to chain_type[][] anymore. > > This includes the check for the default type too, since it cannot be > assume to always have a filter chain for unsupported families. > > Thanks for explaining. LGTM, this will prbably also fix the other sytbot splat wrt. nla_strcmp().
