From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit a01cbae57ec29b161d42ee1caa4ffffda5d519c2 ]
Use the element from the loop iteration, not the same element we want to
deactivate otherwise this branch always evaluates true.
Fixes: 6c03ae210ce3 ("netfilter: nft_set_hash: add non-resizable hashtable implementation")
Reported-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c b/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c
index 8dde4bfe8b8a..05118e03c3e4 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static void *nft_hash_deactivate(const struct net *net,
hash = nft_jhash(set, priv, &this->ext);
hlist_for_each_entry(he, &priv->table[hash], node) {
- if (!memcmp(nft_set_ext_key(&this->ext), &elem->key.val,
+ if (!memcmp(nft_set_ext_key(&he->ext), &elem->key.val,
set->klen) &&
nft_set_elem_active(&he->ext, genmask)) {
nft_set_elem_change_active(net, set, &he->ext);
--
2.20.1
