Hi, currently a ruleset like this loads fine: table inet filter { chain input { type filter hook input priority filter; policy accept; meta l4proto vmap { tcp : jump tcp_chain, udp : jump udp_chain } counter packets 0 bytes 0 jump other_chain } chain forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; } chain output { type filter hook output priority filter; policy accept; } chain tcp_chain { counter packets 18 bytes 1017 } chain udp_chain { counter packets 0 bytes 0 } chain other_chain { counter packets 0 bytes 0 } } but it doesn't do what would be expected, tcp or udp traffic will jump to the appropriate chain, but 'other' protocols will never make it to other_chain. Instead, users need a workaround like this: table inet filter { chain input { type filter hook input priority filter; policy accept; jump test_proto_chain } chain test_proto_chain { meta l4proto vmap { tcp : goto tcp_chain, udp : goto udp_chain } counter packets 2 bytes 168 goto other_chain } chain forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; } chain output { type filter hook output priority filter; policy accept; } chain tcp_chain { counter packets 29 bytes 1966 } chain udp_chain { counter packets 4 bytes 774 } chain other_chain { counter packets 2 bytes 168 } } The intermediate chain (test_proto_chain) allows to then call the real chains via goto, so the remaining rules in test_proto_chain get omitted in case the goto label is found, and if not the next rule does the catchall/default handling. This isn't really nice, there should be a better way to do this. It would be possible to make ruleset A just work by resurrecting my old patch to not set NFT_BREAK in case no vmap entry is found, then the rule would continue evaluation and hit the '... jump other' expression. If thats unwanted, nft should at least complain/warn that the 'counter jump other_chain' part will never be run, i.e. similar to how nft handles constructs like this: inet-filter:7:25-31: Error: Statement after terminal statement has no effect jump test_proto_chain counter accept ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^^^^^^^ I can make a patch that adds this warning, are there any suggestions on how to handle/add default/catchall support? I still think making 'A' "just work" is the most sane option, it needs very little kernel changes, needs no extra keywords and it looks "natural" to me to make vmap a no-op if no jump/goto was executed.