On 2019-12-05, at 11:49:59 +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Pablo, comparing the x_tables and nftables connmark implementations > > I see that nftables doesn't support all the bit-twiddling that > > x_tables does. Why is this? Was it not wanted or has it just not > > been imple- mented? > > The latter. It would be needed to extend nft_bitwise.c to accept a > second register value and extend nft userspace to accept non-immediate > values as second operand. Thanks for the explanation. J.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
