The description of the set statement asserts that the set must have been
created with the "dynamic" flag, but the following example doesn't
agree.
The simplest way to resolve the inconsistency would be to add the
missing flag to the example, but the description is not correct and the
example doesn't require the flag, so I've attempted to improve the
description.
Change log:
* In v1, I was under the impression that the "dynamic" flag was never
required and just dropped all mention of it from the description.
However, there are circumstances under which it is required, so in
v2 I expand the description to explain them.
Jeremy Sowden (1):
doc: fix inconsisntency in set statement documentation.
doc/statements.txt | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.24.0
