Re: [PATCH nf-next 3/5] netfilter: nft_tunnel: add inet type check in nft_tunnel_mode_validate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 06:35:34PM +0800, wenxu@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: wenxu <wenxu@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add ipv6 tunnel check in nft_tunnel_mode_validate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/nft_tunnel.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_tunnel.c b/net/netfilter/nft_tunnel.c
> index b60e855..580b51b 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nft_tunnel.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_tunnel.c
> @@ -18,9 +18,19 @@ struct nft_tunnel {
>  	enum nft_tunnel_mode	mode:8;
>  };
>  
> +enum nft_inet_type {
> +	NFT_INET_NONE_TYPE,
> +	NFT_INET_IPV4_TYPE,
> +	NFT_INET_IPV6_TYPE,
> +};
> +
>  static bool nft_tunnel_mode_validate(enum nft_tunnel_mode priv_mode,
> -				     u8 tun_mode)
> +				     u8 tun_mode, enum nft_inet_type type)
>  {
> +	if ((type == NFT_INET_IPV6_TYPE && !(tun_mode & IP_TUNNEL_INFO_IPV6)) ||
> +	    (type == NFT_INET_IPV4_TYPE && (tun_mode & IP_TUNNEL_INFO_IPV6)))
> +		return false;
> +
>  	if (priv_mode == NFT_TUNNEL_MODE_NONE ||
>  	    (priv_mode == NFT_TUNNEL_MODE_RX &&
>  	     !(tun_mode & IP_TUNNEL_INFO_TX)) ||
> @@ -47,7 +57,8 @@ static void nft_tunnel_get_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
>  			nft_reg_store8(dest, false);
>  			return;
>  		}
> -		if (nft_tunnel_mode_validate(priv->mode, tun_info->mode))
> +		if (nft_tunnel_mode_validate(priv->mode, tun_info->mode,
> +					     NFT_INET_NONE_TYPE))
>  			nft_reg_store8(dest, true);
>  		else
>  			nft_reg_store8(dest, false);
> @@ -57,7 +68,8 @@ static void nft_tunnel_get_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
>  			regs->verdict.code = NFT_BREAK;
>  			return;
>  		}
> -		if (nft_tunnel_mode_validate(priv->mode, tun_info->mode))
> +		if (nft_tunnel_mode_validate(priv->mode, tun_info->mode,
> +					     NFT_INET_NONE_TYPE))
>  			*dest = ntohl(tunnel_id_to_key32(tun_info->key.tun_id));
>  		else
>  			regs->verdict.code = NFT_BREAK;
> @@ -67,7 +79,8 @@ static void nft_tunnel_get_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
>  			regs->verdict.code = NFT_BREAK;
>  			return;
>  		}
> -		if (nft_tunnel_mode_validate(priv->mode, tun_info->mode))
> +		if (nft_tunnel_mode_validate(priv->mode, tun_info->mode,
> +					     NFT_INET_IPV4_TYPE))

Add nft_tunnel_mode_match_ip() that wraps on nft_tunnel_mode_match()
that I proposed on patch 1/5.

>  			*dest = tun_info->key.u.ipv4.src;
>  		else
>  			regs->verdict.code = NFT_BREAK;
> @@ -77,7 +90,8 @@ static void nft_tunnel_get_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
>  			regs->verdict.code = NFT_BREAK;
>  			return;
>  		}
> -		if (nft_tunnel_mode_validate(priv->mode, tun_info->mode))
> +		if (nft_tunnel_mode_validate(priv->mode, tun_info->mode,
> +					     NFT_INET_IPV4_TYPE))
>  			*dest = tun_info->key.u.ipv4.dst;
>  		else
>  			regs->verdict.code = NFT_BREAK;
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux