Re: [nft PATCH] mnl: Replace use of untyped nftnl data setters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [nft PATCH] mnl: Replace use of untyped nftnl data setters
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 13:45:20 +0100
Cc: netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20191029125420.26178-1-phil@nwl.cc>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 01:54:20PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Setting strings won't make a difference, but passing data length to
> *_set_data() functions allows for catching accidental changes on either
> side.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx>

Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [nft PATCH] mnl: Replace use of untyped nftnl data setters
  - From: Phil Sutter

References:
- [nft PATCH] mnl: Replace use of untyped nftnl data setters
  - From: Phil Sutter

Prev by Date: Re: [conntrack-tools PATCH] docs: refresh references to /proc/net/core/rmem_default
Next by Date: Re: [nft PATCH] mnl: Replace use of untyped nftnl data setters
Previous by thread: [nft PATCH] mnl: Replace use of untyped nftnl data setters
Next by thread: Re: [nft PATCH] mnl: Replace use of untyped nftnl data setters
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netfitler Users] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [LARTC] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux