On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:25 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add audit container identifier support to the action of signalling the
> audit daemon.
>
> Since this would need to add an element to the audit_sig_info struct,
> a new record type AUDIT_SIGNAL_INFO2 was created with a new
> audit_sig_info2 struct. Corresponding support is required in the
> userspace code to reflect the new record request and reply type.
> An older userspace won't break since it won't know to request this
> record type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/audit.h | 7 +++++++
> include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 1 +
> kernel/audit.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/audit.h | 1 +
> security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
> index 0c18d8e30620..7b640c4da4ee 100644
> --- a/include/linux/audit.h
> +++ b/include/linux/audit.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,13 @@ struct audit_sig_info {
> char ctx[0];
> };
>
> +struct audit_sig_info2 {
> + uid_t uid;
> + pid_t pid;
> + u64 cid;
> + char ctx[0];
> +};
> +
> struct audit_buffer;
> struct audit_context;
> struct inode;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> index 4ed080f28b47..693ec6e0288b 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@
> #define AUDIT_SET_FEATURE 1018 /* Turn an audit feature on or off */
> #define AUDIT_GET_FEATURE 1019 /* Get which features are enabled */
> #define AUDIT_CONTAINER_OP 1020 /* Define the container id and info */
> +#define AUDIT_SIGNAL_INFO2 1021 /* Get info auditd signal sender */
>
> #define AUDIT_FIRST_USER_MSG 1100 /* Userspace messages mostly uninteresting to kernel */
> #define AUDIT_USER_AVC 1107 /* We filter this differently */
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index adfb3e6a7f0c..df3db29f5a8a 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ struct audit_net {
> kuid_t audit_sig_uid = INVALID_UID;
> pid_t audit_sig_pid = -1;
> u32 audit_sig_sid = 0;
> +u64 audit_sig_cid = AUDIT_CID_UNSET;
>
> /* Records can be lost in several ways:
> 0) [suppressed in audit_alloc]
> @@ -1094,6 +1095,7 @@ static int audit_netlink_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, u16 msg_type)
> case AUDIT_ADD_RULE:
> case AUDIT_DEL_RULE:
> case AUDIT_SIGNAL_INFO:
> + case AUDIT_SIGNAL_INFO2:
> case AUDIT_TTY_GET:
> case AUDIT_TTY_SET:
> case AUDIT_TRIM:
> @@ -1257,6 +1259,7 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
> struct audit_buffer *ab;
> u16 msg_type = nlh->nlmsg_type;
> struct audit_sig_info *sig_data;
> + struct audit_sig_info2 *sig_data2;
> char *ctx = NULL;
> u32 len;
>
> @@ -1516,6 +1519,30 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
> sig_data, sizeof(*sig_data) + len);
> kfree(sig_data);
> break;
> + case AUDIT_SIGNAL_INFO2:
> + len = 0;
> + if (audit_sig_sid) {
> + err = security_secid_to_secctx(audit_sig_sid, &ctx, &len);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
> + sig_data2 = kmalloc(sizeof(*sig_data2) + len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!sig_data2) {
> + if (audit_sig_sid)
> + security_release_secctx(ctx, len);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + sig_data2->uid = from_kuid(&init_user_ns, audit_sig_uid);
> + sig_data2->pid = audit_sig_pid;
> + if (audit_sig_sid) {
> + memcpy(sig_data2->ctx, ctx, len);
> + security_release_secctx(ctx, len);
> + }
> + sig_data2->cid = audit_sig_cid;
> + audit_send_reply(skb, seq, AUDIT_SIGNAL_INFO2, 0, 0,
> + sig_data2, sizeof(*sig_data2) + len);
> + kfree(sig_data2);
> + break;
> case AUDIT_TTY_GET: {
> struct audit_tty_status s;
> unsigned int t;
> @@ -2384,6 +2411,7 @@ int audit_signal_info(int sig, struct task_struct *t)
> else
> audit_sig_uid = uid;
> security_task_getsecid(current, &audit_sig_sid);
> + audit_sig_cid = audit_get_contid(current);
> }
I've been wondering something as I've been working my way through
these patches and this patch seems like a good spot to discuss this
... Now that we have the concept of an audit container ID "lifetime"
in the kernel, when do we consider the ID gone? Is it when the last
process in the container exits, or is it when we generate the last
audit record which could possibly contain the audit container ID?
This patch would appear to support the former, but if we wanted the
latter we would need to grab a reference to the audit container ID
struct so it wouldn't "die" on us before we could emit the signal info
record.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
