Re: [iptables PATCH 05/14] nft: Introduce nft_bridge_commit()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [iptables PATCH 05/14] nft: Introduce nft_bridge_commit()
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 12:36:32 +0200
Cc: netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20190916165000.18217-6-phil@nwl.cc>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 06:49:51PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> No need to check family value from nft_commit() if we can have a
> dedicated callback for bridge family.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx>

Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [iptables PATCH 00/14] Improve iptables-nft performance with large rulesets
  - From: Phil Sutter
- [iptables PATCH 05/14] nft: Introduce nft_bridge_commit()
  - From: Phil Sutter

Prev by Date: Re: [iptables PATCH 04/14] nft: Use nftnl_*_set_str() functions
Next by Date: Re: [iptables PATCH 07/14] nft Increase mnl_talk() receive buffer size
Previous by thread: [iptables PATCH 05/14] nft: Introduce nft_bridge_commit()
Next by thread: [iptables PATCH 11/14] nft: Allow to fetch only a specific chain from kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netfitler Users] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [LARTC] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux