On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 12:13:54PM -0400, Eric Garver wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:54:18PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 07:27:13PM -0400, Eric Garver wrote:
> > > If --echo is used the rule cache will not be populated. This causes
> > > rules added using the "index" keyword to be simply appended to the
> > > chain. The bug was introduced in commit 3ab02db5f836 ("cache: add
> > > NFT_CACHE_UPDATE and NFT_CACHE_FLUSHED flags").
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Garver <eric@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > I think the issue is in cache_evaluate(). It sets the flags to
> > > NFT_CACHE_FULL and then bails early, but I'm not sure of the best way to
> > > fix it. So I'll start by submitting a test case. :)
> > > ---
> > > tests/shell/testcases/cache/0007_echo_cache_init_0 | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > .../cache/dumps/0007_echo_cache_init_0.nft | 7 +++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100755 tests/shell/testcases/cache/0007_echo_cache_init_0
> > > create mode 100644 tests/shell/testcases/cache/dumps/0007_echo_cache_init_0.nft
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/shell/testcases/cache/0007_echo_cache_init_0 b/tests/shell/testcases/cache/0007_echo_cache_init_0
> > > new file mode 100755
> > > index 000000000000..280a0d06bdc3
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tests/shell/testcases/cache/0007_echo_cache_init_0
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > > +#!/bin/bash
> > > +
> > > +set -e
> > > +
> > > +$NFT -i >/dev/null <<EOF
> > > +add table inet t
> > > +add chain inet t c
> > > +add rule inet t c accept comment "first"
> > > +add rule inet t c accept comment "third"
> > > +EOF
> > > +
> > > +# make sure the rule cache gets initialized when using echo option
> > > +#
> > > +$NFT --echo add rule inet t c index 0 accept comment '"second"' >/dev/null
> >
> > Looks like the problem is index == 0?
>
> No. The index gets incremented by 1 by the JSON parser (CLI does the
> same thing). It's never zero if the "index" keyword is used.
>
> It's just as easily reproduced if you use any other index.
I see, thanks. This one is passing tests here:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1158616/
