Re: [PATCH nf-next v2] netfilter: nf_table_offload: Fix the incorrect rcu usage in nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi pablo,


any other questions about this patch?


BR

wenxu

On 8/19/2019 9:22 PM, wenxu@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: wenxu <wenxu@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The flow_block_ing_cmd() needs to call blocking functions while iterating
> block_ing_cb_list, nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd is in the cb_list,
> So it is the incorrect rcu case. To fix it just traverse the list under
> the commit mutex.
>
> Fixes: 9a32669fecfb ("netfilter: nf_tables_offload: support indr block call")
> Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
> index b95e27b..5431741 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
> @@ -363,11 +363,12 @@ void nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd(struct net_device *dev,
>  	const struct nft_table *table;
>  	const struct nft_chain *chain;
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry_rcu(table, &net->nft.tables, list) {
> +	mutex_lock(&net->nft.commit_mutex);
> +	list_for_each_entry(table, &net->nft.tables, list) {
>  		if (table->family != NFPROTO_NETDEV)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		list_for_each_entry_rcu(chain, &table->chains, list) {
> +		list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) {
>  			if (nft_is_base_chain(chain)) {
>  				struct nft_base_chain *basechain;
>  
> @@ -382,4 +383,5 @@ void nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd(struct net_device *dev,
>  			}
>  		}
>  	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&net->nft.commit_mutex);
>  }



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux