Hi pablo, any other questions about this patch? BR wenxu On 8/19/2019 9:22 PM, wenxu@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: wenxu <wenxu@xxxxxxxxx> > > The flow_block_ing_cmd() needs to call blocking functions while iterating > block_ing_cb_list, nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd is in the cb_list, > So it is the incorrect rcu case. To fix it just traverse the list under > the commit mutex. > > Fixes: 9a32669fecfb ("netfilter: nf_tables_offload: support indr block call") > Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c > index b95e27b..5431741 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c > @@ -363,11 +363,12 @@ void nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd(struct net_device *dev, > const struct nft_table *table; > const struct nft_chain *chain; > > - list_for_each_entry_rcu(table, &net->nft.tables, list) { > + mutex_lock(&net->nft.commit_mutex); > + list_for_each_entry(table, &net->nft.tables, list) { > if (table->family != NFPROTO_NETDEV) > continue; > > - list_for_each_entry_rcu(chain, &table->chains, list) { > + list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) { > if (nft_is_base_chain(chain)) { > struct nft_base_chain *basechain; > > @@ -382,4 +383,5 @@ void nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd(struct net_device *dev, > } > } > } > + mutex_unlock(&net->nft.commit_mutex); > }