when spinlock is locked/unlocked, its elements will be changed, so marking it as __read_mostly is not suitable and remove a duplicate definition of nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock strange that compiler does not complain Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx> --- net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 3 +-- net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c index 81a8ef42b88d..0c63120b2db2 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c @@ -73,8 +73,7 @@ struct conntrack_gc_work { }; static __read_mostly struct kmem_cache *nf_conntrack_cachep; -static __read_mostly spinlock_t nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock; -static __read_mostly DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock); +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock); static __read_mostly bool nf_conntrack_locks_all; /* every gc cycle scans at most 1/GC_MAX_BUCKETS_DIV part of table */ diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c index d1c6b2a2e7bd..522792556632 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.h> #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.h> -static __read_mostly DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nf_connlabels_lock); +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nf_connlabels_lock); static int replace_u32(u32 *address, u32 mask, u32 new) { -- 2.16.2