Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I know I sent a RFC using typeof(), I wonder if you could just use the
> selector instead, it's a bit of a lot of type typeof() . typeof()
> probably.
>
> So this is left as this:
>
> type osf name
>
> in concatenations, like this:
>
> nft add set ip filter allowed "{ type ip daddr . tcp dport; }"
>
> Probably I would ask my sysadmin friends what they think.
Yes, please do, it would be good to get a non-developer perspective.
I'm very used to things like sizeof(), so typeof() felt natural to me.
Might be very un-intuitive for non-developers though, so it would be
good to get outside perspective.
Thanks!
