Re: [PATCH RFC nf-next] Introducing stateful object update operation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 8/6/19 1:06 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 12:29:45PM +0200, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
>> I have been thinking of a way to update a quota object. i.e raise or lower the
>> quota limit of an existing object. I think it would be ideal to implement the
>> operations of updating objects in the API in a generic way.
>>
>> Therefore, we could easily give update support to each object type by adding an
>> update operation in the "nft_object_ops" struct. This is a conceptual patch so
>> it does not work.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h        |  4 ++++
>>  include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h |  2 ++
>>  net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c            | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
>> index 9b624566b82d..bd1e6c19d23f 100644
>> --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
>> +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
>> @@ -1101,6 +1101,7 @@ struct nft_object_type {
>>   *	@eval: stateful object evaluation function
>>   *	@size: stateful object size
>>   *	@init: initialize object from netlink attributes
>> + *	@update: update object from netlink attributes
>>   *	@destroy: release existing stateful object
>>   *	@dump: netlink dump stateful object
>>   */
>> @@ -1112,6 +1113,9 @@ struct nft_object_ops {
>>  	int				(*init)(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
>>  						const struct nlattr *const tb[],
>>  						struct nft_object *obj);
>> +	int				(*update)(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
>> +						  const struct nlattr *const tb[],
>> +						  struct nft_object *obj);
>>  	void				(*destroy)(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
>>  						   struct nft_object *obj);
>>  	int				(*dump)(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
>> index 82abaa183fc3..8b0a012e9177 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
>> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ enum nft_verdicts {
>>   * @NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ: create a stateful object (enum nft_obj_attributes)
>>   * @NFT_MSG_GETOBJ: get a stateful object (enum nft_obj_attributes)
>>   * @NFT_MSG_DELOBJ: delete a stateful object (enum nft_obj_attributes)
>> + * @NFT_MSG_UPDOBJ: update a stateful object (enum nft_obj_attributes)
>>   * @NFT_MSG_GETOBJ_RESET: get and reset a stateful object (enum nft_obj_attributes)
>>   * @NFT_MSG_NEWFLOWTABLE: add new flow table (enum nft_flowtable_attributes)
>>   * @NFT_MSG_GETFLOWTABLE: get flow table (enum nft_flowtable_attributes)
>> @@ -119,6 +120,7 @@ enum nf_tables_msg_types {
>>  	NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ,
>>  	NFT_MSG_GETOBJ,
>>  	NFT_MSG_DELOBJ,
>> +	NFT_MSG_UPDOBJ,
> 
> No need for this new message type, see below.
> 
>>  	NFT_MSG_GETOBJ_RESET,
>>  	NFT_MSG_NEWFLOWTABLE,
>>  	NFT_MSG_GETFLOWTABLE,
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
>> index 605a7cfe7ca7..c7267f418808 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
>> @@ -5420,6 +5420,16 @@ static void nft_obj_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_object *obj)
>>  	kfree(obj);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int nf_tables_updobj(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
>> +			    struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>> +			    const struct nlattr * const nla[],
>> +			    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> +	/* Placeholder function, here we would need to check if the object
>> +	 * exists. Then init the context and update the object.*/
>> +	return 1;
> 
> Use the existing nf_tables_newobj(), if NLM_F_EXCL is not set on and
> the object exists, then this is an update.
> 

I agree on that. But I think that if we use the NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ there
will be some issues in the commit and the abort phase. That is why I
think "NFT_MSG_UPDOBJ" would be needed.

Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux