Re: [PATCH net 0/2] flow_offload hardware priority fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jakub,

On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 01:47:38PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:00:23 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > Hi Jakub,
> > 
> > If the user specifies 'pref' in the new rule, then tc checks if there
> > is a tcf_proto object that matches this priority. If the tcf_proto
> > object does not exist, tc creates a tcf_proto object and it adds the
> > new rule to this tcf_proto.
> > 
> > In cls_flower, each tcf_proto only stores one single rule, so if the
> > user tries to add another rule with the same 'pref', cls_flower
> > returns EEXIST.
> 
> So you're saying this doesn't work?
> 
> ip link add type dummy
> tc qdisc add dev dummy0 clsact
> tc filter add dev dummy0 ingress protocol ipv6 prio 123 flower src_ip 1111::1 action drop
> tc filter add dev dummy0 ingress protocol ipv6 prio 123 flower src_ip 1111::2 action drop

This works indeed as you describe.

I'll go back to the original netfilter basechain priority patch then:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1140412/

That patch removed the reference to tcf_auto_prio() already, please
let me know if you have any more specific update you would like to see
on that patch.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux