On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 01:48:34 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Most drivers do the same thing to set up the block, add a helper
> function to do this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
> index 534a545ea51e..003f24a1323f 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
> @@ -922,6 +922,26 @@ static int tcf_block_setup(struct tcf_block *block, struct tc_block_offload *bo)
> return err;
> }
>
> +int tcf_setup_block_offload(struct tc_block_offload *f, tc_setup_cb_t *cb,
> + void *cb_ident, void *cb_priv, bool ingress_only)
> +{
> + if (ingress_only &&
> + f->binder_type != TCF_BLOCK_BINDER_TYPE_CLSACT_INGRESS)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + switch (f->command) {
> + case TC_BLOCK_BIND:
> + return tcf_block_cb_register(f->block, cb, cb_ident, cb_priv,
> + f->extack);
> + case TC_BLOCK_UNBIND:
> + tcf_block_cb_unregister(f->block, cb, cb_ident);
> + return 0;
> + default:
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcf_setup_block_offload);
> +
> static struct rhashtable indr_setup_block_ht;
>
> struct tc_indr_block_dev {
This change is pretty much unrelated to the rest of the series, isn't
it? Can you please post it separately and make the series smaller
this way?
Perhaps tcf_setup_block_offload_simple() would be a good name for this
helper?
